基于定性比较分析的旅游地环境冲突影响因素—以五台山景区为例

李洋洋; 张甜; 赵振斌; 张建荣; 李小永

doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-04-006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于定性比较分析的旅游地环境冲突影响因素—以五台山景区为例

旅游地理 | 更新时间：2024-08-01

- 基于定性比较分析的旅游地环境冲突影响因素—以五台山景区为例
- Influencing factors of environment conflict in tourism destinations based on qualitative comparative analysis—A case study of Mount Wutai Scenic Spot
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2024年54卷第4期页码：627-638
- 作者机构：
  
  1.陕西师范大学　地理科学与旅游学院，陕西　西安　710119
  2.山西财经大学　文化旅游学院，山西　太原　030003
  3.扬州大学　旅游烹饪学院，江苏　扬州　225127
- 作者简介：
  
  李洋洋，女，从事旅游开发与社区冲突研究，953261495@qq.com。
  赵振斌，男，教授，博士生导师，从事乡村社会文化地理、社区旅游及其影响研究，zhaozhb@snnu.edu.cn。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AZD051);国家自然科学基金(41971227)
- DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-04-006
  中图分类号： F590
- 纸质出版日期：2024-08-25，
  
  收稿日期：2024-01-10，
- 稿件说明：
扫描看全文
李洋洋, 张甜, 赵振斌, 等. 基于定性比较分析的旅游地环境冲突影响因素—以五台山景区为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(4):627-638.

LI Yangyang, ZHANG Tian, ZHAO Zhenbin, et al. Influencing factors of environment conflict in tourism destinations based on qualitative comparative analysis—A case study of Mount Wutai Scenic Spot[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(4):627-638.
李洋洋, 张甜, 赵振斌, 等. 基于定性比较分析的旅游地环境冲突影响因素—以五台山景区为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(4):627-638. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-04-006.

LI Yangyang, ZHANG Tian, ZHAO Zhenbin, et al. Influencing factors of environment conflict in tourism destinations based on qualitative comparative analysis—A case study of Mount Wutai Scenic Spot[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(4):627-638. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-04-006.

摘要

环境冲突是旅游地主客冲突的主要内容之一，探寻环境冲突的影响因素对于旅游地空间规划和冲突化解有重要理论与现实意义。该文以五台山景区为例，通过扎根理论与定性比较分析相结合的混合研究方法探究了环境冲突在居民与游客2个群体中的主观呈现，并进一步分析了引发感知环境冲突的多重路径。主要得到以下结论：①居民与游客感知旅游地环境冲突类型具有同一性与异质性，景区管理混乱是2个群体冲突感知同一性的具体表达，异质性则体现在居民更多关注游客不当行为，而游客则更重视旅游地环境功能单一；②以节假、秩序与设施为代表的核心冲突条件表明，主观空间占有与体验权的错位是引致2个群体感知环境冲突产生的关键要素；③规范失效是导致文化旅游地环境冲突的特殊因素，在居民和游客群体中均有表现。

Abstract

Environmental conflict is one of the main elements of resident-tourist conflict in tourism destinations

and exploring the influencing factors of environmental conflict is of great theoretical and practical significance for spatial planning and conflict resolution in tourism destinations. Taking Mount Wutai Scenic Spot as an example

this paper compares the subjective dimension of environmental conflict in the two groups of residents and tourists through a combination of grounded theory and qualitative comparative analysis

and analyzes the multiple paths that lead to multiple perceptions of the environmental conflict. The main conclusions are as follows: ① Residents and tourists perceive environmental conflicts in tourist destinations with both commonalities and differences. The commonality is expressed through the disordered management of scenic spots. The difference lies in residents focusing on tourists’ inappropriate behavior

while tourists are concerned about the limited functions of the tourist environment. ② The core conflict conditions represented by holidays

order and facilities show that the dislocation of subjective space possession and experience rights is the core element leading to the perceived environment conflict between the two groups. ③ Anomie of norm is a special factor that leads to the environmental conflict in cultural tourism destinations

and this is evident among both residents and tourists.

关键词

环境冲突主客冲突定性比较分析文化旅游地五台山

Keywords

environment conflictresident-tourist conflictqualitative comparative analysiscultural tourist destinationMount Wutai

references

周春发. 乡村旅游地居民的日常抵抗：以徽村拆建房风波为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(2): 32-36.

ZHOU C F. Residents’ daily resistance in rural tourist destinations: A case study of disturbances concerning tearing down and building houses in Hui Village[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(2): 32-36.

陈佳, 张丽琼, 杨新军, 等. 乡村旅游开发对农户生计和社区旅游效应的影响：旅游开发模式视角的案例实证[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1709-1724.

CHEN J, ZHANG L Q, YANG X J, et al. The impact of tourism development on changes of households’ livelihood and community tourism effect: A case study based on the perspective of tourism development mode[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(9): 1709-1724.

张红霞, 苏勤, 王群. 国外有关旅游资源游憩价值评估的研究综述[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(1): 31-35.

ZHANG H X, SU Q, WANG Q. A summary of overseas research on the recreational value evaluation of tourism resources[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2006, 21(1): 31-35.

石培华, 吴普. 中国旅游业能源消耗与CO2排放量的初步估算[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 235-243.

SHI P H, WU P. A rough estimation of energy consumption and CO2 emission in tourism sector of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(2): 235-243.

钟洁, 陈飙. 西部民族地区旅游社会冲突的协调与社会和谐发展[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 32(2): 140-144.

张彦, 于伟. 主客冲突对旅游目的地居民心理幸福感的影响：基于山东城市历史街区的研究[J]. 经济管理, 2014, 36(4): 117-125.

ZHANG Y, YU W. Study on the influence of hosts and tourists conflictson residents’ psychological well-being in tourism destination: Take city historic districts in Shandong Province as examples[J]. Economic Management, 2014, 36(4): 117-125.

孙九霞, 陈景, 黄秀波. 大理洱海旅游环境治理事件中的主体博弈与权益协商[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1468-1475.

SUN J X, CHEN J, HUANG X B. The bargain between subjects and rights negotiation in the tourism environmental governance issue of Erhai in Dali[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 1468-1475.

SHAPIRA N, HOUSH M, BROITMAN D. Decision-makers matter: An operational model for environmental-economic conflict resolution[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2019, 98: 77-87.

穆从如, 杨勤业, 刘雪华. 环境冲突分析研究及其地理学内涵[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(S1): 186-192.

MU C R, YANG Q Y, LIU X H. Research on environmental conflict analyses and its signification in geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(S1): 186-192.

蒋桂萍. 环境伦理与环境冲突[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2012, 32(3): 30-32.

柴寿升, 龙春凤, 常会丽. 基于社区居民感知的景区旅游开发与社区利益冲突研究：以崂山风景区为例[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2012(2): 62-67.

CHAI S S, LONG C F, CHANG H L. Research on the conflicts between scenic area tourism development and community interests based on community residents’ perception: A case study of Laoshan Scenic Area[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences), 2012(2): 62-67.

何学欢, 胡东滨, 粟路军. 旅游地居民感知公平、关系质量与环境责任行为[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(9): 117-131.

HE X H, HU D B, SU L J. Destination resident’s perceived justice, relational quality, and environmentally responsible behavior[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(9): 117-131.

王兆峰, 腾飞. 西部民族地区旅游利益相关者冲突及协调机制研究[J]. 江西社会科学, 2012, 32(1): 196-201.

MARTIN A. Environmental conflict between refugee and host communities[J]. Journal of Peace Research, 2005, 42(3): 329-346.

IDE T. Toward a constructivist understanding of socio-environmental conflicts[J]. Civil Wars, 2016, 18(1): 69-90.

祁悦, 谢高地, 盖力强, 等. 基于表观消费量法的中国碳足迹估算[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(11): 2053-2058.

QI Y, XIE G D, GAI L Q, et al. Estimation of China’ s carbon footprint based on apparent consumption[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(11): 2053-2058.

吴怡, 张丹丹. 基于社会-技术界面的中国共享单车绿色发展路径探析[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(7): 113-119, 139.

王媛, 杨萍. 论风险社会视阈下的互动式环境传播体系建构[J]. 东南传播, 2020(1): 7-9.

井思宇. 环境正义视阈下环境风险受众感知及行动研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019.

刘阳, 赵振斌. 居民主体视角下民族旅游社区多群体冲突的空间特征及形成机制：以西江千户苗寨为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(7): 2086-2101.

LIU Y, ZHAO Z B. The spatial characteristics and formation mechanism of multi group conflicts in ethnic tourism community from the perspective of residents: A case study of Xijiang Qianhu Miao Village[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(7): 2086-2101.

褚玉杰, 赵振斌, 张铖, 等. 旅游社区多群体态度差异和冲突倾向的空间特征：以西安汤峪镇为例[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6): 1045-1058.

CHU Y J, ZHAO Z B, ZHANG C, et al. Spatial features of preference difference and conflict potential among multi-groups in tourism community: A case of Tangyu town in Xi’an[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(6): 1045-1058.

熊礼明. 游客对农业文化遗产地旅游主客冲突感知研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(23): 316-320.

XIONG L M. A study on tourism host-guest conflict perception from tourists in agricultural heritage areas[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(23): 316-320.

张江驰, 谢朝武. 旅游凝视视角下城市边缘型社区居民：游客价值共创研究[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(6): 173-182.

ZHANG J C, XIE C W. The value co-creation of resident and tourist in urban fringe communities from tourism gaze perspective[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(6): 173-182.

李小永, 赵振斌, 李佳乐, 等. 居民视角下民族社区旅游化的空间演变过程及特征：以肇兴侗寨为例[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(5): 1051-1064.

LI X Y, ZHAO Z B, LI J L, et al. Spatial evolution and characteristics of tourismization in ethnic community from the perspective of residents: A case of the Zhaoxing Dong Village[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(5): 1051-1064.

张力伟, 肖晨卉. 阶梯理论下环境冲突的解决机制：基于不同案例的对比分析[J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2018(4): 5-11.

蔡克信, 潘金玉, 贺海. 利益、权力和制度：旅游社会冲突的成因机制[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 44(1): 48-55.

CAI K X, PAN J Y, HE H. Interest, power, and institutions: On genetic mechanism for tourism social conflict[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 44(1): 48-55.

杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA)：管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.

毛湛文. 定性比较分析(QCA)与新闻传播学研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2016, 38(4): 6-25.

李洋洋, 赵振斌, 李小永, 等. 老家依恋对秦巴山区生态移民新环境融入的影响：基于陕南三市的案例研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10): 2541-2556.

LI Y Y, ZHAO Z B, LI X Y, et al. The influence of hometown attachment towards environmental integration of ecological migrants in Qinba Mountainous Area: Based on the case study of three cities in Southern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(10): 2541-2556.

王凤彬, 江鸿, 王璁. 央企集团管控架构的演进：战略决定、制度引致还是路径依赖？：一项定性比较分析(QCA)尝试[J]. 管理世界, 2014(12): 92-114, 187-188.

WANG F B, JIANG H, WANG C. The evolution of the control framework China’s central SOEs: Is it strategy determined, institution driven, or dependence on the path? An attempt of a quality comparative analysis[J]. Management World, 2014(12): 92-114, 187-188.

黄荣贵, 桂勇. 互联网与业主集体抗争：一项基于定性比较分析方法的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2009, 24(5): 29-56, 243.

HUANG R G, GUI Y. The internet and homeowners’ collective resistance: A qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Sociological Studies, 2009, 24(5): 29-56, 243.

李彪, 王永祺, 杨小涵. 网络小说成为超级IP的影响因素与生成机理研究：基于45例网络小说IP的定性比较分析(QCA)[J]. 国际新闻界, 2018, 40(12): 165-180.

LI B, WANG Y Q, YANG X H. Influence factors and generating mechanism of online novels becoming super IP: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) based on 45 cases of online novels[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 2018, 40(12): 165-180.

范香花, 程励. 共享视角下乡村旅游社区居民旅游支持度的复杂性：基于fsQCA方法的分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(4): 36-50.

FAN X H, CHENG L. The complexity of residents’ support for rural tourism development based on shared perspective: Using the fsQCA approach[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(4): 36-50.

张建荣. 五台山景区主客冲突结构与形成机制[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2019.

蒋婷, 张朝枝. 世俗与神圣的交集：禅修旅游体验的核心[J]. 旅游论坛, 2019, 12(2): 14-19.

JIANG T, ZHANG C Z. Intersection of secular and sacredness: A discussion on the concept of Zen meditation tourism[J]. Tourism Forum, 2019, 12(2): 14-19.

YANG J J, RYAN C, ZHANG L Y. Social conflict in communities impacted by tourism[J]. Tourism management, 2013, 35: 82-93.

程聪, 贾良定. 我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究：基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(6): 113-121.

CHENG C, JIA L D. Research on the driving pattern of China’s enterprise cross-border M&As: A qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016, 19(6): 113-121.

吴继霞, 何雯静. 扎根理论的方法论意涵、建构与融合[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 7(1): 35-49.

WU J X, HE W J. The methodological implication, construction and integration of the grounded theory[J]. Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition), 2019, 7(1): 35-49.

孙晓娥. 扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 31(6): 87-92.

SUN X E. Grounded theory: Theory-development in in-depth interview research[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University(Social Sciences), 2011, 31(6): 87-92.

邓胜利, 付少雄. 定性比较分析(QCA)在图书情报学中的应用：以网络社区健康信息搜寻影响因素研究为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(12): 23-28, 11.

DENG S L, FU S X. Applying qualitative comparative analysis to library and information science: A case study of influencing factors of network community health information seeking[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2017, 40(12): 23-28, 11.

闫佳祺, 罗瑾琏, 贾建锋. 组织情境因素联动效应对双元领导的影响：一项基于QCA技术的研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(4): 150-160.

YAN J Q, LUO J L, JIA J F. Interaction effects of organizational contextual factors on ambidextrous leadership: Based on QCA method[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T, 2018, 39(4): 150-160.

(比)伯努瓦·里豪克斯, (美)查尔斯C拉金. QCA设计原理与应用：超越定性与定量研究的新方法[M]. 杜运周, 李永发, 等，译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017.

许振晓, 张捷, Geoffrey Wall, 等. 居民地方感对区域旅游发展支持度影响：以九寨沟旅游核心社区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(6): 736-744.

XU Z X, ZHANG J, WALL G, et al. Research on influence of residents’ place attachment on positive attitude to tourism with a mediator of development expectation: A case of core tourism community in Jiuzhaigou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6): 736-744.

汪德根, 王金莲, 陈田, 等. 乡村居民旅游支持度影响模型及机理：基于不同生命周期阶段的苏州乡村旅游地比较[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426.

WANG D G, WANG J L, CHEN T, et al. Influence model and mechanism of the rural residents for tourism support: A comparison of rural destinations of Suzhou in different life cycle stages[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426.

孟威, 保继刚. 从运动式治理到常态治理：5A景区治理的政策网络分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(4): 66-76.

MENG W, BAO J G. From campaign-style governance to daily governance: A policy network analysis of “5A” tourist attractions in China[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(4): 66-76.

于佳, 谢彦君, 卫银栋. 禁忌的张力：西藏宗教旅游场中具身体验的心理动力机制分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(9): 54-66.

YU J, XIE Y J, WEI Y D. The tension of taboo: An analysis of the psychological motivation mechanism of the embodied experience in Tibetan religious tourist field[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(9): 54-66.

WANG L G, YOTSUMOTO Y. A different interpretation from Cornet’ s on tourism development in an ethnic minority village in China[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2018, 23(9): 847-861.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据