浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.陕西师范大学 西北国土资源研究中心,陕西 西安 710119
2.陕西师范大学 西北城镇化与国土环境空间模拟重点实验室,陕西 西安 710119
3.温州大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 温州 325035
夏伊凡,女,从事城市交通地理研究。
黄晓燕,女,教授,博士生导师,从事城市地理与城乡规划研究,hxiaoy@snnu.edu.cn。
纸质出版日期:2024-04-25,
收稿日期:2023-11-08,
扫 描 看 全 文
夏伊凡, 黄晓燕, 康晨晨, 等. 陕西省传统村落可达性特征及影响因素的空间分异[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2024,54(2):288-299.
XIA Yifan, HUANG Xiaoyan, KANG Chenchen, et al. Spatial differentiation of accessibility characteristics and influencing factors of traditional villages in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(2):288-299.
夏伊凡, 黄晓燕, 康晨晨, 等. 陕西省传统村落可达性特征及影响因素的空间分异[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2024,54(2):288-299. DOI: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-014.
XIA Yifan, HUANG Xiaoyan, KANG Chenchen, et al. Spatial differentiation of accessibility characteristics and influencing factors of traditional villages in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(2):288-299. DOI: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-014.
传统村落是推进乡村振兴和新型城镇化建设的重要载体。以陕西省182个国家级传统村落为研究对象,分析其空间分布特征,并运用ArcGIS网络分析和地理加权回归模型,深入剖析县级和镇级尺度下传统村落可达性特征及影响因素的空间分异。研究结果表明:①陕西省国家级传统村落呈集聚型空间分布,在空间上形成了4个主要集聚区。②传统村落可达性整体水平较低,呈现以关中为中心的阶梯状递减特征。③不同空间尺度下的传统村落可达性与影响因素存在着较强的空间不稳定性。县级尺度下,高程与传统村落可达性基本呈正相关关系,但在镇级尺度下,两者正负向关系并存,且呈现以榆林西北部和渭南中部为中心向外围圈层逐渐增强的特点。县级尺度下,近水体最短距离与传统村落可达性水平呈负相关关系,但在镇级尺度下,其对可达性水平的影响呈现出从陕南和陕北向中部逐步递减的趋势。④高程、坡度和近水体最短距离是影响陕西省国家级传统村落可达性的主要因素,且在不同地区具有不同的影响效应。传统村落可达性特征和影响因素的研究可以为不同地区传统村落可达性的改进和传统村落保护利用策略的制定提供科学依据。
Traditional villages are an important carrier for promoting rural revitalization and new urbanization construction. The spatial distribution characteristics of 182 national-level traditional villages in Shaanxi Province were analyzed as research objects. Using ArcGIS network analysis and GWR model
the spatial differentiation of traditional village accessibility characteristics and influencing factors at the county and town scales were analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that: ① The national-level traditional villages in Shaanxi Province are characterized by agglomeration spatial distribution
forming four main agglomeration area in space. ② The overall level of accessibility is low
showing a stepwise decline centered on Guanzhong. ③ There is strong spatial instability in the accessibility and influencing factors of traditional village accessibility at different spatial scales. At the county level
the elevation has a positive correlation with the accessibility of traditional villages. However
at the town level
both positive and negative relationships coexist
and are characterized by a gradual increase from the northwestern part of Yulin and the central part of Weinan to the peripheral circles. At the county level
the distance to neighboring rivers is negatively correlated with the level of accessibility of traditional villages. However
at the town level
its impact on accessibility shows a decreasing trend from southern and northern Shaanxi to the central part of the country. ④ Elevation
slope
and the distance to neighboring rivers are the main factors in the accessibility of national-level traditional villages in Shaanxi Province and have different influencing effects in different areas. Research on the accessibility of traditional villages can help reveal the ways to improve the accessibility of traditional villages in different regions
and can provide a scientific basis for the formulation of future conservation and utilization strategies for traditional villages.
传统村落可达性GWR模型不同尺度陕西省
traditional villagesaccessibilitygeographically weighted regression modeldifferent scalesShaanxi Province
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 住房城乡建设部文化部财政部关于公布第一批列入中国传统村落名录村落名单的通知[EB/OL]. (2012-12-20)[2015-06-19]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201212/t20121219_212340.htmlhttp://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201212/t20121219_212340.html.
陶伟, 陈红叶, 林杰勇. 句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(2): 209-218.
TAO W, CHEN H Y, LIN J Y. Spatial form and spatial cognition of traditional village in syntactical view: A case study of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(2): 209-218.
康璟瑶, 章锦河, 胡欢, 等. 中国传统村落空间分布特征分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(7): 839-850.
KANG J Y, ZHANG J H, HU H, et al. Analysis on the spatial distribution characteristics of Chinese traditional villages[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(7): 839-850.
刘大均, 胡静, 陈君子, 等. 中国传统村落的空间分布格局研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(4): 157-162.
LIU D J, HU J, CHEN J Z, et al. The study of spatial distribution of traditional villages in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(4): 157-162.
陈志文, 胡希军, 叶向阳, 等. 中国传统村落有机体生长内在逻辑研究[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(11): 225-232.
CHEN Z W, HU X J, YE X Y, et al. Internal logic of organic growth in Chinese traditional villages[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(11): 225-232.
杨丽婷, 曾祯. 古村落保护与开发综合价值评价研究:以浙江省磐安县为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2013, 32(4): 112-116,122.
YANG L T, ZENG Z. Research on evaluation of ancient village’s integrated value of the protection and development: A case study of Pan’an County of Zhejiang Province [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2013, 32(4): 112-116,122.
汪清蓉, 李凡. 古村落综合价值的定量评价方法及实证研究:以大旗头古村为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(1): 19-24.
WANG Q R, LI F. On the quantitative evaluation method of ancient village’s comprehensive value and demonstration study[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2006, 21(1): 19-24.
何艳冰, 张彤, 熊冬梅. 传统村落文化价值评价及差异化振兴路径:以河南省焦作市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(10): 230-239.
HE Y B, ZHANG T, XIONG D M. Evaluation on cultural value of traditional villages and differential revitalization: A case study of Jiaozuo City, Henan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(10): 230-239.
康晨晨, 黄晓燕, 夏伊凡. 传统村落文化遗产价值分级分类评价体系构建及实证:以陕西省国家级传统村落为例[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(2):84-96.
KANG C C, HUANG X Y, XIA Y F. Construction and empirical evidence of graded and classified evaluati on system of tradition alvillage cultural herita gevalue: A case of national traditional villages in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 51(2):84-96.
王云才, 郭焕成, 杨丽. 北京市郊区传统村落价值评价及可持续利用模式探讨:以北京市门头沟区传统村落的调查研究为例[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(6): 735-742.
WANG Y C, GUO H C, YANG L. The discussion on evaluation and sustainable development models of traditional villages in the western mountainous area of Beijing: A case study of traditional villages in Mentougou District of Beijing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2006, 26(6): 735-742.
刘春腊, 刘沛林. 北京山区沟域经济建设背景下的古村落保护与开发研究[J]. 经济地理, 2011, 31(11): 1923-1929.
LIU C L, LIU P L. Probe into protecting and developing ancient villages while constructing valley economy in the mountain area of Beijing[J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(11): 1923-1929.
祁嘉华, 郑晔梅. 新农村建设语境中的古村落保护与发展:以陕西为例[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 30(6): 36-41.
QI J H, ZHENG Y M. The preservation and development of ancient villages in the new rural construction: Taking Shaanxi as the example[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology (Social Science Edition), 2011, 30(6): 36-41.
吴琳, 余建忠. 浙江传统村落空间特征与保护利用探索[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(3): 32-39.
WU L, YU J Z. Exploration on the spatial characteristics and protection utilization of traditional villages in Zhejiang Province[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(3): 32-39.
许建和, 乐咏梅, 毛洲, 等. 湖南省传统村落空间格局影响因素与保护模式[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(10): 147-153.
XU J H, LE Y M, MAO Z, et al. Influencing factors and protection modes of the spatial pattern of traditional villages in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(10): 147-153.
邵秀英, 刘亚玲, 王向东, 等. 黄河流域传统村落旅游响应度及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(6): 200-208.
SHAO X Y, LIU Y L, WANG X D, et al. Tourism responsiveness of traditional villages in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(6): 200-208.
陈刚. 发展人类学视角下西部民族地区传统村落旅游开发[J]. 旅游学刊, 2017, 32(2): 11-12.
CHEN G. Spatial form and spatial cognition of traditional village in syntactical view: A case study of Xiaozhou Village, Guangzhou[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(2): 11-12.
李连璞. 基于多维属性整合的古村落旅游发展模式研究:以历史文化名村为例[J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(4): 155-160.
LI L P. Tourism sustainable development of villages based on multiattributes: A case study of national historical cultural village[J]. Human Geography, 2013, 28(4): 155-160.
黄卉洁, 苗红, 王云. 西北地区传统村落旅游开发潜力评价研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(6): 106-110,117.
HUANG H J, MIAO H, WANG Y. Research on the tourism development potential of traditional villages in Northwest China[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2021, 40(6): 106-110,117.
杨立国, 刘沛林, 林琳. 传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应:以侗族村寨为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 593-598.
YANG L G, LIU P L, LIN L. The effect of traditional village landscape genes in construction place identity: Taking the Dong minority village as an example[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(5): 593-598.
李伯华, 石凯霞. 传统村落景观基因识别及其特征分析:以张谷英村为例[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报, 2018, 39(3): 1-7.
LI B H, SHI K X. Landscape gene identification and its characteristic analysis of traditional villages: A case study of Zhangguiying Villages[J]. Journal of Hengyang Normal University, 2018, 39(3): 1-7.
陈娱, 金凤君, 陆玉麒, 等. 京津冀地区陆路交通网络发展过程及可达性演变特征[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2252-2264.
CHEN Y, JIN F J, LU Y Q, et al. Development history and accessibility evolution of land transportation network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2252-2264.
路海艳, 赵鹏军, 董亚宁, 等. 高铁站可达性与城乡居民收入差异空间分异研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 131-142.
LU H Y, ZHAO P J, DONG Y N, et al. Accessibility of high-speed rail stations and spatial disparity of urban-rural income gaps[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(1): 131-142.
陈洁, 陆锋, 程昌秀. 可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5): 100-110.
CHEN J, LU F, CHENG C X. Advance in accessibility evaluation approaches and applications[J]. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26(5): 100-110.
翟石艳, 何新新, 孔云峰, 等. 基于最优供需分配的公共设施空间可达性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 1028-1038.
ZHAI S Y, HE X X, KONG Y F, et al. Measuring the spatial accessibility of public services by optimal supply-demand allocation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 1028-1038.
仝德, 孙裔煜, 谢苗苗. 基于改进高斯两步移动搜索法的深圳市公园绿地可达性评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(7): 1113-1126.
TONG D, SUN Y Y, XIE M M. Evaluation of green space accessibility based on improved Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method: A case study of Shenzhen City, China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(7): 1113-1126.
张忠训, 杨庆媛, 王立, 等. 少数民族地区传统村落交通可达性分析——以贵州省铜仁市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(11): 2296-2306.
ZHANG Z X, YANG Q Y, WANG L, et al. Traffic accessibility analysis of traditional villages in minority areas: A case study of Tongren City, Guizhou Province[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(11): 2296-2306.
胡金龙, 艾烨, 郑文俊, 等. 基于空间句法的桂林市传统村落可达性研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 41(1): 38-46.
HU J L, AI Y, ZHENG W J, et al. A Research on the accessibility of traditional villages in Guilin based on space syntax[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition), 2022, 41(1): 38-46.
窦银娣, 彭姗姗, 李伯华, 等. 湖南省传统村落空间可达性研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2015, 31(5): 554-558,583,641.
DOU Y D, PENG S S, LI B H, et al. Study on spatial accessibility of traditional village in Human Province[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2015, 31(5): 554-558,583,641.
付强, 杨壮, 董锁成, 等. 河南省国家级传统村落空间可达性及影响因素研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 49(6): 82-90.
FU Q, YANG Z, DONG S C, et al. Research on spatial accessibility and influencing factors of national traditional villages in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(6): 82-90.
马勇, 黄智洵. 基于GWR模型的长江中游城市群传统村落空间格局及可达性探究[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(4):78-85.
MA Y, HUANG Z X. Research on spatial distribution and accessibility of the traditional village in the urban agglomeration on the middle reaches of the Yangtze River based on GWR model[J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(4): 78-85.
FOTHERINGHAM A S, CHARLTON M E, BRUNSDON C. Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1998, 30(11): 1905-1927.
BRUNSDON C, FOTHERINGHAM A S, CHARLTON M E. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1996, 28(4): 281-298.
MCMILLEN D P. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2004, 86(2): 554-556.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构