基于不同主体的生态系统服务流时空特征及影响因素研究——以苹果供给服务为例

陈文婷; 陈海; 贾哲; 耿甜伟

doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于不同主体的生态系统服务流时空特征及影响因素研究——以苹果供给服务为例

地理研究 | 更新时间：2024-04-19

- 基于不同主体的生态系统服务流时空特征及影响因素研究——以苹果供给服务为例
- Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services flow based on different entities: A case study of apple provisioning services
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2024年54卷第2期页码：251-262
- 作者机构：
  
  1.西北大学　城市与环境学院/陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室，陕西　西安　710127
  2.西安科技大学　马克思主义学院，陕西　西安　710054
  3.太原师范学院　地理科学学院，山西　晋中　030619
- 作者简介：
  
  陈文婷，女，博士研究生，从事生态系统服务研究，202010223@stumail.nwu.edu.cn。
  陈海，男，教授，博士生导师，从事土地利用及可持续发展研究，chw@nwu.edu.cn。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(41971271;41871185);山西省基础研究计划(202203021222243)
- DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-011
  中图分类号： K901
- 纸质出版日期：2024-04-25，
  
  收稿日期：2023-09-10，
扫描看全文
陈文婷, 陈海, 贾哲, 等. 基于不同主体的生态系统服务流时空特征及影响因素研究——以苹果供给服务为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(2):251-262.

CHEN Wenting, CHEN Hai, JIA Zhe, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services flow based on different entities: A case study of apple provisioning services[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(2):251-262.
陈文婷, 陈海, 贾哲, 等. 基于不同主体的生态系统服务流时空特征及影响因素研究——以苹果供给服务为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024,54(2):251-262. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-011.

CHEN Wenting, CHEN Hai, JIA Zhe, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services flow based on different entities: A case study of apple provisioning services[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,54(2):251-262. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2024-02-011.

摘要

揭示食物供给服务流的时空特征及影响因素是保证粮食安全、确保该服务持续供给的必要前提和重要依据。以苹果供给服务为例，首先构建了研究理论框架，随后采用空间自相关、地理探测器等方法分析了客商、企业、电商3类主体作用下苹果供给服务流(apple provision service flow，APEF)的时空特征及影响因素。结果表明：①APEF时间上呈季节式变化，秋季流量最高，夏季最少，受节假日影响“波峰”型态势明显，不同主体差异较大；②空间上呈“喇叭”状多核心分布，主要流向为华东、华南、西南地区，其中客商呈“南—北”走向的放射状，企业呈“三核三线”状，电商呈“多核心串珠状”；③APEF的主要影响因素包括苹果产量、经济发展和消费水平。研究结论可为解决生态系统服务供需时空错配及科学管理提供理论参考。

Abstract

Revealing the spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of food supply service flow is a necessary prerequisite and important basis for ensuring food security and sustainable supply of this service. Taking Apple’s supply services as an example

a research theoretical framework was first constructed. Then

methods such as spatial autocorrelation and geographic detectors were used to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of Apple Provision Service Flow (APEF) under the influence of three main entities: merchants

enterprises

and e-commerce. The results show that ① the APEF time shows a seasonal variation

with the highest flow in autumn and the lowest in summer. The " peak" trend is significantly affected by holidays

and there are significant differences among different subjects. ②In terms of space

it is distributed in a " trumpet" shape with multiple cores

mainly flowing towards the eastern

southern

and southwestern regions of China. Among them

customers are in a radial shape with a " south-north" direction

enterprises are in a " three core and three line" shape

and e-commerce is in a " multi-core bead string" shape. ③The main influencing factors of APEF include apple production

economic development

and consumption level. The research conclusion can provide theoretical reference for solving the spatiotemporal mismatch between supply and demand of ecosystem services and scientific management.

关键词

生态系统服务流主体时空变化影响因素

Keywords

ecosystem service flowentitiesspatiotemporal variationsinfluencing factors

references

DAWSON N, MARTIN A. Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: A disaggregated study in western Rwanda[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 117: 62-72.

李双成. 生态系统服务地理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.

MEHRING M, OTT E, HUMMEL D. Ecosystem services supply and demand assessment: Why social-ecological dynamics matter[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 30: 124-125.

傅伯杰, 欧阳志云, 施鹏, 等. 青藏高原生态安全屏障状况与保护对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(11): 1298-1306.

FU B J, OUYANG Z Y, SHI P, et al. Current condition and protection strategies of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological security barrier[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(11):1298-1306.

刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 丁圣彦. 人类活动对生态系统服务流的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3232-3242.

LIU H M, LIU L Y, DING S Y. The impact of human activities on ecosystem service flows[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10):3232-3242.

耿甜伟. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务流时空特征及调节机制研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2022.

BURKHARD B, KANDZIORA M, HOU Y, et al. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification[J]. Landscape Online, 2014, 34: 1-32.

SHI Y S, SHI D H, ZHOU L L, et al. Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 115: 106418.

赵雪雁, 马平易, 李文青, 等. 黄土高原生态系统服务供需关系的时空变化[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2780-2796.

ZHAO X Y, MA P Y, LI W Q, et al. The spatiotemporal changes in the supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 76(11):2780-2796.

DU H Q, ZHAO L, ZHANG P T, et al. Ecological compensation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on ecosystem services flow[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 331: 117230.

XU L Y, HANG Y, JIN F. Evaluating the supply-demand relationship for urban green parks in Beijing from an ecosystem service flow perspective[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2023, 85:127974.

LIU J G, YANG W, LI S X. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2016, 14(1): 27-36.

VILLAMAGNA A M, ANGERMEIER P L, BENNETT E M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15: 114-121.

FELIPE-LUCIA M R, MARTÍN-LÓPEZ B, LAVOREL S, et al. Ecosystem services flows: Why stakeholders’ power relationships matter[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0132232.

刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 任嘉衍, 等. 生态系统服务流定量化研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2723-2730.

LIU H M, LIU L Y, REN J Y, et al. Progress in quantitative research on ecosystem service flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2723-2730.

ZHANG J X, HE C Y, HUANG Q X, et al. Understanding ecosystem service flows through the metacoupling framework[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 151: 110303.

杨正忠, 徐昔保, 李景宜, 等. 生态系统服务流研究进展与展望[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(7): 827-838.

YANG Z Z, XU X B, LI J Y, et al. Research progress and prospects of ecosystem service flow[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(7):827- 838.

GUAN D J, DENG Z, ZHOU L L, et al. How can multiscenario flow paths of water supply services be simulated? A supply-flow-demand model of ecosystem services across a typical basin in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 893: 164770.

李晶, 任志远. 基于GIS的陕北黄土高原土地生态系统固碳释氧价值评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(14):2943-2950.

LI J, REN Z Y. Research on the values of CO2 fixation and O2 release by landuse ecosystem in loess plateau in northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(14):2943-2950.

ZHANG C, LI J, ZHOU Z X, et al. Application of ecosystem service flows model in water security assessment: A case study in Weihe River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 120: 106974.

XIE G D, LIU J Y, XU J, et al. A spatio-temporal delineation of trans-boundary ecosystem service flows from Inner Mongolia[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(6): 065002.

张欣蓉, 王晓峰, 程昌武, 等. 基于供需关系的西南喀斯特区生态系统服务空间流动研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(9): 3368-3380.

ZHANG X R, WANG X F, CHENG C W, et al. Research on spatial flow of ecosystem services in southwest karst region based on supply and demand relationship[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9):3368-3380.

陈梓隆, 林静玉, 黄金良. 水质胁迫下闽东南地区流域淡水生态系统服务流研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(8): 1051-1063.

CHEN Z L, LIN J Y, HUANG J L. A study on the service flow of freshwater ecosystems in the southeast fujian basin under water quality stress[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(8):1051-1063.

GENG T W, CHEN H, LIU D, et al. Research on mediating mechanisms and the impact on food provision services in poor areas from the perspective of stakeholders[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(19): 10510.

刘慧敏. 基于生态系统服务流视角的人地系统动态演化评估[J]. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(7): 21-32.

LIU H M. Evaluation of dynamic evolution of human earth system from the perspective of ecosystem service flow[J]. Environmental Ecology, 2023, 5(7):21-32.

BUKEVICIUTE L, DIERX A, ILZKOVITZ F. The functioning of the food supply chain and its effect on food prices in the European Union[M]. Brussels: Office for Infrastructures and Logistics of the European Communities, 2009.

MÜLLER F, BICKING S, AHRENDT K, et al. Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112: 106116.

姚婧, 何兴元, 陈玮. 生态系统服务流研究方法最新进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 335-342.

YAO J, HE X Y, CHEN W. The latest progress in research methods for ecosystem service flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(1): 335-342.

孙梨梨. 洛川县水资源承载力评价及优化配置研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.

刘乐彤. 乡村振兴背景下洛川苹果生产现状及转型升级研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.

冯文彬. 基于供需关系的粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务流研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2023.

连虎刚, 曲张明, 刘春芳, 等. 北方防沙带河西走廊段景观格局时空演变及其防风固沙服务响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2518-2526.

LIANG H G, QU Z M, LIU C F, et al. The spatiotemporal evolution of landscape pattern in the Hexi Corridor section of the northern sand prevention belt and its response to wind and sand fixation services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(6):25-33.

王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器：原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.

WANG J F, XU C D. Geodetectors: Principles and prospects[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1):116-134.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

甘肃省石窟的时空分布特征及其影响因素

中国旅游特色小镇空间分布及影响因素

不同地形条件下农村空心化程度微尺度研究

近20年甘肃省临夏州植被覆盖度的时空变化及其影响因素

苜蓿生物炭对磺胺甲恶唑的吸附机理研究