孔隙演化定量分析及在盆地模拟中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长8油层为例
Quantitative analysis of pore evolution and its application to basin simulation: A case from Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui Area, Ordos Basin, NW China
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2023年53卷第5期 页码：843-856
- 作者机构：
1.咸阳师范学院 地理与环境学院，陕西 咸阳 712000
2.江西省数字国土重点实验室，江西 南昌 330013
3.低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室，陕西 西安 710018
4.中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院，陕西 西安 710018
5.东华理工大学 地球科学学院，江西 南昌 330013
- 作者简介：
尚婷，女，博士，从事油气地质学、沉积学及地理学研究，84524325@qq.com。
- 基金信息：江西省数字国土重点实验室开放基金(DLLJ202017)
DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-016
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
尚婷, 王斌, 杨庆坤, 等. 孔隙演化定量分析及在盆地模拟中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长8油层为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(5):843-856.
SHANG Ting, WANG Bin, YANG Qingkun, et al. Quantitative analysis of pore evolution and its application to basin simulation: A case from Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui Area, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(5):843-856.
尚婷, 王斌, 杨庆坤, 等. 孔隙演化定量分析及在盆地模拟中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长8油层为例[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(5):843-856. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-016.
SHANG Ting, WANG Bin, YANG Qingkun, et al. Quantitative analysis of pore evolution and its application to basin simulation: A case from Chang 8 reservoir in Heshui Area, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(5):843-856. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-016.
摘要
以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系延长组长8段为研究对象，通过岩心观察和薄片鉴定分析，结合物性分析等方法，对研究区的岩石学特征、物性特征、成岩作用和成岩序列进行系统研究，并进一步对储层孔隙演化进行定量分析，最后利用定量的孔隙演化结果进行油气运聚模拟恢复。研究表明，研究区储层岩性为粉砂岩夹泥岩或泥质粉砂岩，具有典型的低孔、低渗特征；在成岩作用特征和成岩史研究的基础上，依据大量的统计资料，并以现今孔隙度作为约束条件，定量恢复出了成岩期的孔隙演化过程，综合所得的孔隙演化的定量模拟结果与实际地质情况较为吻合；利用定量化的孔隙演化结果，运用PetroMod软件进行油气运聚模拟恢复，得出盆地石油充注开始于晚侏罗世(J,3,)末期，生排烃和聚集量均达到峰值出现于早白垩世(K,1,)末期，到白垩世末期时仍具有较高的聚集量，聚集量显著减少为现今阶段。同时，将该研究模型与实际钻探成果相叠加，对模拟结果进行检验，结果合理，可将其推广应用到同类型其他油田中，对进一步勘探开发提供一定借鉴。
Abstract
Taking the Chang 8 Member of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Heshui Area of Ordos Basin as the research object, the petrological, porosity, permeability characteristics, diagenesis and diagenetic sequence were researched; through core observation and thin section identification, combined with physical properties analysis and other methods. Furthermore, the quantitative analysis of reservoir pore evolution was carried out. Finally, the quantitative pore evolution results were used to simulate the recovery of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. The result shows that the lithology of reservoir in the study area was siltstone with mudstone or argillaceous siltstone, which has typical characteristics of low porosity and low permeability. Based on the study of diagenetic characteristics and diagenetic history, and taking the present porosity as the constraint condition, the pore evolution process of diagenetic period was quantitatively recovered, the quantitative simulation results of pore evolution in diagenetic period were consistent with the actual geological situation. Using the quantified pore evolution results, PetroMod software was used to simulate the recovery of hydrocarbon migration. The results show that the oil charging in the basin began at the end of Late jurassic (J,3,), the peak of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion and accumulation appeared at the end of Early cretaceous (K,1,), to the late cretaceous which still had high aggregation, and the accumulation was significantly reduced to the present stage. Meanwhile, the model is superimposed with the actual drilling results to test the simulation results. The results proved reasonable, and it can be applied to other oilfields of the same type, providing some reference for further exploration and development.
关键词
鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区成岩作用孔隙演化盆地模拟
Keywords
Ordos BasinHeshui Areadiagenesispore evolutionbasin modeling
references
杜金虎, 杨涛, 李欣. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司“十二五”油气勘探发现与“十三五”展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(2): 1-15.
DU J H, YANG T, LI X. Oil and gas exploration and discovery of petrochina company limited during the 12th five-year plan and the prospect during the 13th five-year plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(2): 1-15.
杨俊杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002: 86-102.
何自新. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003: 95-105.
胡文瑞, 翟光明. 鄂尔多斯盆地油气勘探开发的实践与可持续发展[J]. 中国工程科学, 2010, 12(5): 64-72.
HU W R, ZHAI G M. Practice and sustainable development of oil and nature gas exploration and development in Ordos Basin[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2010, 12(5): 64-72.
杨华, 付金华, 何海清, 等. 鄂尔多斯华庆地区低渗透岩性大油区形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6): 641-648.
YANG H, FU J H, HE H Q, et al. Formation and distribution of large low-permeability lithologic oil regions in Huaqing, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 641-648.
段毅, 吴保祥, 张辉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田原油地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(2): 301-310.
DUAN Y, WU B X, ZHANG H, et al. Geochemistry and genesis of crude oils of the Xifeng Oilfield in the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(2): 301-310.
李士祥, 楚美娟, 黄锦绣, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组砂体结构特征及成因机理[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(3): 435-444.
LI S X, CHU M J, HUANG J X, et al. Characteristic and genetic mechanism of sandbody architecture in Chang 8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(3): 435-444.
陈义国, 贺永红, 王超, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组8段非常规油藏成因与成藏模式——以盆地东南部甘泉西区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1270-1286.
CHEN Y G, HE Y H, WANG C, et al.Genesis and accumulation patterns of unconventional oil reservior in Member 8 of Triassic Yanchang Formation: A case study of the western Ganquan area, southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1270-1286.
ATHY L F. Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1): 1-24.
MAXWELL J C. Influence of depth, temperature, and geologic age on prosity of quartzose sandstone[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1964, 48(5): 697-709.
SCHMOKER J W, GAUTIER D L. Sandstone porosity as function of thermal maturity[J]. Geology, 1988, 16(12): 1007-1010.
TAYLOR T R, GILES M R, HATHON L A, et al. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: Model, myths, and reality[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94(8): 1093-1132.
孟元林, 王又春, 姜文亚, 等. 辽河拗陷双清地区古近系沙河街组四段孔隙度演化模拟[J]. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(2): 125-132.
MENG Y L, WANG Y C, JIANG W Y, et al. Porosity evolutin simulation of Member 4 of Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Shuangqing Area, Liaohe Depression[J]. Journal of Paleogeography, 2009, 11(2): 125-132.
刘贵满, 孟元林, 魏巍. 松辽盆地北部泉三、四段低渗透储层孔隙度演化史[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012, 31(3): 266-274.
LIU G M, MENG Y L, WEI W, et al.Porosity evolving history of low permeability reservoirs in the third and the fourth members of the Quantou Formation in the northern Songliao Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineraloge, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(3): 266-274.
王英民. 海相残余盆地成藏动力学过程模拟理论与方法：以广西十万大山盆地为例[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1998.
唐俊, 王琪, 廖朋, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地环县地区长8段砂岩储层孔隙度演化定量模拟[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 49(3): 320-327.
TANG J, WANG Q, LIAO P, et al.Quantitative simulation of porosity-evolution in the Member 8 sandstone reservoir of the Yanchang Formation in Huanxian Oilfied, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences), 2013, 49(3): 320-327.
张荣虎, 姚根顺, 寿建峰, 等. 成岩、构造一体化孔隙度预测模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(3): 145-152.
ZHANG R H, YAO G S, SHOU J F, et al.An integeration porosity forecast model of deposion, diagenesis and structure[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(3): 145-152.
CATALAN L, XIAOWEN F, CHATZIS I, et al. An experimental study of secondary oil migration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1992, 76(4): 638-650.
THOMAS M M, CLOUSE J A. Scaled physical model of secondary oil migration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1995, 79(1): 19-59.
石广仁. 盆地模拟技术30年回顾与展望[J]. 石油工业计算机应用, 2009, 61(1): 3-7.
SHI G R. Review and outlook for the 30Th anniversary of basin modeling techniques[J]. Computer Application of Petrleum, 2009, 61(1): 3-7.
张庆春, 石广仁, 田在艺. 盆地模拟技术的发展现状与未来展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2001, 23(3): 312-317.
ZHANG Q C, SHI G R, TIAN Z Y. Present developing situation and future prospects of basin simulation technology[J]. Petrleum Geology Experimnet, 2001, 23(3): 312-317.
CURRY D J. Future directions in basin and petroleum systems modelling: A survey of the community[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2019, 103(10): 2285-2293.
樊婷婷, 柳益群, 黄进腊, 等. 合水地区长8储层成岩作用及对储层物性的影响[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 40(3): 481-487.
FAN T T, LIU Y Q, HUANG J L, et al.The disgenesis of Chang 8 reservior sandtone and its effect on reservior quality in the Heshui Region[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 40(3): 481-487.
刘鑫, 张晓磊, 赵应权, 等. 镇北—环县地区长4＋5油层组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(4): 149-157.
LIU X, ZHANG X L, ZHAO Y Q, et al. Influential factors and characteristics of Chang 4＋5 reservoir in Yanchang Formation in Zhenbei-Huanxian area of Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(4): 149-157.
郑庆华, 柳益群. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇北地区延长组长4＋5致密油层成岩作用及成岩相[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(5): 1001-1012.
ZHENG Q H, LIU Y Q. Diagenesis and diagenetic lithofacies of tight reservoir of Chang 4＋5 member of Yanchang formation in Zhenbei, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 1001-1012.
付金华, 邓秀芹, 王琪, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长8储集层致密与成藏耦合关系：来自地球化学和流体包裹体的证据 [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 48-57.
FU J H, DENG X Q, WANG Q, et al. Compaction and hydrocarbon accumulation of Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 8 member, Ordos Basin, NW China: Evidences from geochemistry and fluid inclusions[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 48-57.
罗明高, 黄健全, 唐洪. 油气在储层孔喉中的微观运移机理探讨[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(2): 269-272.
LUO M G, HUANG J Q, TANG H. A quantitative study on hydrocarbon migration mechanis min pores and throats of reservoir[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(2): 269-272.
王琪, 禚喜准, 陈国俊, 等. 延长组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物氧碳同位素组成特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 27(10): 28-34.
WANG Q, ZHUO X Z, CHEN G J, et al. Characteristics of carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of carbonate cements in Triassic Yanchang sandstone in Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(10): 28-34.
杨奕华, 南君祥, 贺静, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界砂岩储层的显微特征及储集性的影响因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2001, 6(4): 37-43.
YANG Y H, NAN J X, HE J, et al. Microscopic characteristics and influencing factors of Upper Paleozoic sandstone reservoir in Ordos Basin[J]. China Petrolum Exploration, 2001, 6(4): 37-43.
季汉成, 翁庆萍, 杨潇. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞—神木地区山西组成岩与沉积相耦合关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(6): 709-717.
JI H C, WENG Q P, YANG X. Coupling of diagenesis and sedimentary facies of Shanxi Formation in An’sai-Shenmu, Ordos Basin[J]. PetrolumExploration and Development, 2009, 36(6): 709-717.
黄思静, 黄培培, 王庆东, 等. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7-13.
HUANG S J, HUANG P P, WANG Q D, et al. The significance of cementation in porosity preservation in deep-buried sandstones[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 19(3): 7-13.
刘军锋, 周学军, 刁帆, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地演武高地延长组长3储层特征及控制因素[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009, 31(5): 197-200.
LIU J F, ZHOU X J, DIAO F, et al. Analysis on controlling factors and reservoir characteristics of Chang 3 Formation in Yanwu Highland in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009, 31(5): 197-200.
高辉, 孙卫, 宋广涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长8储层特低渗透成因分析与评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2008, 27(5): 71-76.
GAO H, SUN W, SONG G T, et al. Origin analysis of extra low-permeability and evaluation of Chang 8 reservior in Heshui Area of Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008, 27(5): 71-76.
刘翰林, 杨友运, 王凤琴, 等. 致密砂岩储集层微观结构特征及成因分析：以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长6段和长8段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(2): 223-234.
LIU H L, YANG Y Y, WANG F Q, et al. Micro pore and throat characteristics and origin of tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 223-234.
BEARD D C, WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2): 349-369.
SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones: A model for sandstone porosity prediction[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5): 485-491.
刘震, 邵新军, 金博, 等. 压实过程中埋深和时间对碎屑岩孔隙度演化的共同影响[J]. 现代地质, 2007, 21(1): 125-132.
LIU Z, SHAO X J, JIN B, et al.Co-effect of depth and burial time on the evolution of porosity for classic rocks during the stage of compaction[J]. Geoscience, 2007, 21(1): 125-132.
付晶, 吴胜和, 付金华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组储层定量成岩相研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(2): 86-97.
FU J, WU S H, FU J H, et al. Research on quantitative diagenetic facies of the Yanchang Formation in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 86-97.
姚泾利, 唐俊, 庞国印, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地白豹—华池地区长8段孔隙度演化定量模拟[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1): 38-46.
YAO J L, TANG J, PANG G Y, et al. Quantitative simulation on porosity evolution in Member 8 of Yanchang Formation of Baibao-Huachi Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 20(2): 89-97.
陈俊飞, 李琦, 朱如凯, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区长101低孔低渗储层孔隙演化及其定量模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 83-94.
CHEN J F, LI Q, ZHU R K, et al. Pore evolution and its quantitative model of low porosity and low permeability reservoir of Chang 101 in Shanbei Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(1): 83-94.
盛军, 孙卫, 解腾云, 等. 苏里格气田东南部盒8段储层成岩作用研究及其孔隙演化模式定量分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(1): 20-27.
SHENG J, SUN W, XIE T Y, et al. Diagenesis of He 8 reservoir and its quantitative analysis of porosity evolution model in Southeast Sulige gas field[J]. Natural Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(1): 20-27.
王华, 郭建华. 塔中地区石炭系碎屑岩储层成岩作用对孔隙演化控制的定量研究[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2009, 28(3): 277-284.
WANG H, GUO J H. Quantitative research on the control of Carboniferous clastic reservoir diagenesis over pore evolution in Tazhong Area[J]. Acta Petrologica Et Mineralogica, 2009, 28(3): 277-284.
刘林玉, 陈刚, 柳益群, 等. 碎屑岩储集层溶蚀型次生孔隙发育的影响因素分析等[J]. 沉积学报, 1998, 16(2): 97-101.
LIU L Y, CHEN G, LIU Y Q, et al. Analysis on influencing factors of solution type secondary pore-evolution in clastic reservoirs[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1998, 16(2): 97-101.
郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 柳庄小雪, 等. 盆地模拟关键技术之油气运聚模拟技术进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 846-857.
GUO Q L, CHEN N S, LIU Z X U, et al. Advance of basin modeling key techniques: Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 846-857.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- 网络PDF下载
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 地址：陕西省西安市太白北路229号
- 联系电话：029-88302822 Email：xdxbzr@nwu.edu.cn
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 陕ICP备05010980号-4
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies