社区和学校建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响——基于交叉分类多层模型的西安实证

邢慧楠; 黄晓燕; 夏伊凡

doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

社区和学校建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响——基于交叉分类多层模型的西安实证

健康城市 | 更新时间：2023-10-30

- 社区和学校建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响——基于交叉分类多层模型的西安实证
- Associations of neighborhood and school built environment with active commuting to school in children: An empirical study of Xi’an City based on cross-classified multilevel model
- 西北大学学报（自然科学版） 2023年53卷第5期页码：749-760
- 作者机构：
  
  1.陕西师范大学　西北国土资源研究中心，陕西　西安　710119
  2.陕西师范大学　西北城镇化与国土环境空间模拟重点实验室，陕西　西安　710119
- 作者简介：
  
  邢慧楠，女，从事人文地理研究，xhn0129@snnu.edu.cn。
  黄晓燕，女，博士，教授，从事城市地理与城乡规划研究，hxiaoy@snnu.edu.cn。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金(41831284;42371214;41871168)
- DOI：10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-007
  中图分类号：
扫描看全文
邢慧楠, 黄晓燕, 夏伊凡. 社区和学校建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响——基于交叉分类多层模型的西安实证[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(5):749-760.

XING Huinan, HUANG Xiaoyan, XIA Yifan. Associations of neighborhood and school built environment with active commuting to school in children: An empirical study of Xi’an City based on cross-classified multilevel model[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(5):749-760.
邢慧楠, 黄晓燕, 夏伊凡. 社区和学校建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响——基于交叉分类多层模型的西安实证[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023,53(5):749-760. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-007.

XING Huinan, HUANG Xiaoyan, XIA Yifan. Associations of neighborhood and school built environment with active commuting to school in children: An empirical study of Xi’an City based on cross-classified multilevel model[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,53(5):749-760. DOI： 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2023-05-007.

摘要

积极通学是儿童体力活动的重要来源，对儿童身心健康具有重要作用。建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响受到地理学、城市规划、公共健康等多个领域学者的广泛关注，但现有研究对社区和学校建成环境的共同作用和影响差异考虑不足。该研究以西安市为案例地，运用交叉分类多层模型，探究了儿童居住社区和就读学校建成环境对其积极通学的影响。研究发现，① 社区建成环境对儿童积极通学的影响大于学校建成环境；② 影响儿童积极通学的社区与学校建成环境因素不同，社区绿色度的增加能显著促进积极通学，学校餐饮店数量、土地混合使用、十字路口数量均对积极通学产生负效应，但学校公共交通站点数量的提高能促进儿童积极通学；③ 建成环境能够调节通学距离对积极通学的影响效应，社区商店数量的增多会加剧通学距离对积极通学的负效应，社区人口密度、公共交通站点数量和学校绿色度可以削弱通学距离的负效应，从而促进儿童积极通学。研究结论可为促进儿童积极通学的相关公共政策干预和空间调整策略提供参考。

Abstract

Active commuting to school plays a crucial role in promoting physical activity and positively contributes to children’s physical and mental health. While extensive attention has been paid to the impact of built environment on children’s active commuting to school, there is still a lack of consideration for the joint effects and differences in the impact of built environment of neighborhood and school. In this study, a cross-classified multilevel model is employed to investigate the effects of neighborhood and school built environment on children’s active commuting to school in Xi’an. Our findings indicate that: ① Neighborhood built environment has a greater impact on children’s active commuting to school compared to school built environment; ② Neighborhood and school built environment factors that affect children’s active commuting to school are different. For instance, while an increase in the number of school bus stops promotes active commuting to school, factors such as mixed land use, number of school cafeterias, and number of intersections contribute negatively to children’s active commuting. ③ Built environment moderates the effect of distance to school on active commuting to school. An increase in the number of neighborhood stores exacerbated the negative effect of distance on active commuting to school; neighborhood population density, number of bus stops, and school greenery promoted active commuting to school by weakening the negative effect of distance. These research outcomes hold significant implications for developing public policies and spatial adjustments that aim to promote active commuting to schools among children.

关键词

建成环境积极通学交叉分类多层模型儿童西安

Keywords

built environmentactive commuting to schoolcross-classified multilevel modelchildrenXi’an

references

World Health Organization. Report of the committee on ending childhood obesity[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2016.

World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight[EB/OL]. (2021-05-09)[2023-04-21]. https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweighthttps://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.

中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)[EB/OL]. (2020-12-23)[2023-04-21]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-12/24/content_5572983.htm?eqid=ed49bc4e0004423700000003646f196ahttps://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-12/24/content_5572983.htm?eqid=ed49bc4e0004423700000003646f196a.

GUTHOLD R, STEVENS G A, RILEY L M, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants[J]. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2020, 4(1): 23-35.

ORTEGA F B, CADENAS-SÁNCHEZ C, DELGADO G, et al., Systematic review and proposal of a field-based physical fitness-test battery in preschool children: The prefit battery[J]. Sports Medicine, 2015, 45(4): 533-555.

CHEN P J. Physical activity, physical fitness, and body mass index in the Chinese child and adolescent populations: An update from the 2016 physical activity and fitness in China[J]. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2017, 6(4): 381-383.

FAULKNER G E, BULIUNG R N, FLORA P K, et al. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: A systematic review[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2009, 48(1): 3-8.

KEK C C, BENGOECHEA E G, SPENCE J C, et al. The relationship between transport-to-school habits and physical activity in a sample of New Zealand adolescents[J]. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2019, 8(5): 463-470.

刘吉祥, 肖龙珠, 周江评, 等. 建成环境与青少年步行通学的非线性关系：基于极限梯度提升模型的研究[J]. 地理科学进展 2022, 41(2): 251-263.

LIU J X, XIAO L Z, ZHOU J P, et al. Non-linear relationships between the built environment and walking to school: Applying extreme gradient boosting method[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(2): 251-263.

路改改, 殷江滨, 黄晓燕. 城市建成环境对儿童体力活动的影响研究：以西安市为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2020(5): 1-7.

LU G G, YIN J B, HUANG X Y. Associations of urban built environment with physical activity of children: A case study of Xi’an[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2020(5): 1-7.

VAN SLUIJS E M F, EKELUND U, CROCHEMORE-SILVA I, et al. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: Current evidence and opportunities for intervention[J]Lancet, 2021, 398(10298): 429-442.

LARSEN K, GILLILAND J, HESS P M. Route-based analysis to capture the environmental influences on a child’s mode of travel between home and school[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012, 102(6): 1348-1365.

FULTON J E, SHISLER J L, YORE M M, et al. Active transportation to school: Findings from a national survey[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2005, 76(3): 352-357.

ITO K, REARDON T G, ARCAYA M C, et al. Built environment and walking to school findings from a student travel behavior survey in Massachusetts[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2017, 2666(1): 78-84.

SUN G B, HAN X L, SUN S H, et al. Living in school catchment neighborhoods: Perceived built environments and active commuting behaviors of children in China[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2018, 8: 251-261.

MCDONALD N C. Active transportation to school: Trends among U. S. schoolchildren, 1969—2001[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007, 32(6): 509-516.

TIMPERIO A, CRAWFORD D, TELFORD A, et al. Perceptions about local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2004, 38(1): 39-47.

CURTIS C, BABB C, OLARU D. Built environment and children′s travel to school[J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 42: 21-33.

QUERALT A, MOLINA-GARCIA J. Physical activity and active commuting in relation to objectively measured built-environment attributes among adolescents[J]. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2019, 16(5): 371-374.

HELBICH M, VAN EMMICHOVEN M J Z, DIJST M J, et al. Natural and built environmental exposures on children’s active school travel: A dutch global positioning system-based cross-sectional study[J]. Health & Place, 2016, 39: 101-109.

BRAZA M, SHOEMAKER W, SEELEY A. Neighborhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary school in 34 California communities[J]. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2004, 19(2): 128-136.

FRANK L, KERR J, CHAPMAN J, et al. Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance mong youth[J]. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2007, 21(4) 305-311.

EWING R, SCHROEER W, GREENE W. School location and student travel analysis of factors affecting mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1895(1): 55-63.

TIMPERIO A, BALL K, SALMON J, et al. Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006, 30(1): 45-51.

ULFARSSON G F, SHANKAR V N. Children’s travel to school: Discrete choice modeling of correlated motorized and nonmotorized transportation modes using covariance heterogeneity[J]. Environment and Planning, 2008, 35(2): 195-206.

MCMILLAN T E. The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school[J]. Transportation Research, 2007, 41(1): 69-79.

DEWEESE R S, YEDIDIA M J, TULLOCH D L, et al. Neighborhood perceptions and active school commuting in low-income cities[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2013, 45(4): 393-400.

何玲玲, 林琳. 学校周边建成环境对学龄儿童上下学交通方式的影响：以上海市为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2017, 134(3): 30-36.

HE L L, LIN L. The Impacts of school neighborhood built environment on school-age children’s school commuting: A case study of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(3): 30-36.

MOLINA-GARCIA J, CAMPOS S, GARCIA-MASSO X, et al. Different neighborhood walkability indexes for active commuting to school are necessary for urban and rural children and adolescents[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2020, 17(1): 124.

MONIRUZZAMAN M, PAEZ A, HABIB K M N, et al. Mode use and trip length of seniors in Montreal[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 30: 89-99.

COHEN J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1990, 14(1): 71.

GILES-CORTI B, WOOD G, PIKORA T, et al. School site and the potential to walk to school: The impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods[J]. Health & Place, 2011, 17(2): 545-550.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

机动化通勤中介作用下城市建成环境对居民身体健康的影响研究

高密度建成环境与成人肥胖关系的研究现状、启示与展望

2000—2010年西安市人口分布与空间结构研究

目的地投射形象与旅游者感知形象差异分析——以西安为例

历史时期西安城市人居环境建设对秦岭山水的利用